CHAPTER 4
CULTURAL AND INTELLECTUAL LIFE OF ARMENIANS IN INDIA

Armenian Scholars in India
        During the 17th-18th centuries, there were also Armenian historians and scholars in India. Here in India manuscripts were copied and translation works were carried out. Armenian manuscripts on Indian and Armenian history and culture have been written in Surat, Calcutta, Madras, Bombay etc.
        A valuable collection of manuscripts running into several hundred pages on India and Indo-Armenian relations (17th -18th centuries) is in the British Museum. These were written in Surat, Calcutta, New Julfa etc. during 1733-1749. These manuscripts reached London in a very unordinary way. In 1764 Admiral Griffit confiscated an Armenian merchant-vessel as ‘a property of enemy’. All the property on board, including the manuscripts, were sent to London. Afterwards the British Court justified the Admiral’s action, and the manuscripts remained in London.
        The Armenian sources on the history of India assume particular value. Here we have in mind those authors who resided in India or wrote their works while living in this country. Manuscripts of these authors are preserved in Matenadaran, Institute of Ancient Manuscripts in Yerevan. There one can find a brief text about Brahmins where the author describes them as honest, industrious and peaceful people. There are works on India’s geography, ethnography.
        In Matenadaran there are also books on medicine, astronomy and other subjects. Highly valuable is A Textbook on Sanskrit written in the 18th century. All these records bespeak the cultural relations of the two peoples.
        Armenians were coming to India not only for trade and acquiring wealth. In this unfamiliar and mysterious world Armenian merchants, besides material interests, were seeking other interests, too. An interesting example is of Thomas Khojamall, seafarer and prosperous merchant of the 18th century. He was fluent in Persian, Hindi and English languages, and he knew the histories of Armenia and India very well. Khojamall was such an influential person that he went to England to protest against despotic rule of Wansittard, Viceroy of India. He stayed a few years in London and was able to achieve conviction of Wansittard and got 500,000 Dirham  for his complain.88 Armenian literature had its own place in the interests of Thomas Khojamall. Despite being so busy he decided to write the history of India.
        Naturally he could not start such an important and serious work without proper information. With great difficulty Khojamall could obtain permission to work in the Royal Archives of Shah Alam for twelve days. In his work he also used charts and atlases, stories of participants and witnesses of those events.
Thomas Khojamall concluded the History of India in 1768.
        The History of India consists of two parts and Appendices. In the first part there are chapters on: the Christianity of Malabar (from ancient times to the year 1750), the Armenian and Assyrian communities of Cochin, the religions of India, the twelve holy rivers and twenty four holy lakes, and the chronology of Indian Kings.
        The second part begins with an introductory chapter as to how and when the Europeans began to penetrate into India. The next two chapters speak on Anglo-French rivalry in Southern India, Deccan and Karnatik. The subsequent chapters dwell upon the events in Bengal in 1756-1760, during the Nawabship of Siraj-ud-Dowla, the “Black Hole” incident, the events in 1760-1764, about Nawab of Bengal Mir Qasim and his Commander-in-Chief Gorgin Khan, the heroic struggle of the people of India against the British. It should be mentioned that this last part takes up nearly one-third of the writing.
        The Appendix tells about the famous Armenian political figure and poet Mirza-Zul-Qarnain. The author interprets this entire semi-legendary story in the light of historical facts.
        Regarding the “Black Hole” incident it should be stated that no scholar can give specific figures about the dead British prisoners. According to the history, when Siraj-ud-Dowla captured Fort William in Calcutta, on 20th June, 1757 he threw the British soldiers in a small dungeon (18 feet by 14 feet) of the Fort. Next morning many people died because of insufficient air and space. This incident is named in the history as “Black Hole” incident.
        One of the survivors of this incident, J.Z.Holwell stated that the prisoners numbered 146 and only 15 survived.
        A reputed historian, J.H.Little, in the journal Bengal: Past and Present of July-September, 1915, stated that Holwell’s story was a ‘gigantic hoax’, since none of the Muslim historians of Bengal had made any reference to such an important event in their works.
        Thomas Khojamall in his History of India mentions that “more than 15 soldiers died in one night”. Given Khojamall’s negative attitude toward Siraj-ud-dowla, he was supposed to present an exaggerated account of this event. But since he had given such reduced figures, it can be assumed that the “Black Hole” event was blown out of proportion by Holwell.
        There is another Armenian source which states that Holwell exaggerated the figures. That is a letter of a wealthy Armenian merchant Emin to his son Joseph Emin in London:
“The wicked Suraj-ud-Dowlah came with a vast army, destroyed almost 40 innocent English gentlemen in one night in the Black Hole. Calcutta was overset by him. For my share, I have lost 16,000 rupees.”
        A wealthy merchant, having close economic relations with the East India Company and losing Rs.16,000, naturally could not speak about his enemy without exaggerating the facts. But the figure given by him is much less than 131.
        Unfortunately the original copy of The History of India has not been accessible. The detailed description of the contents of the book was published in Calcutta in the Armenian magazine Shtemaran in 1822.
        Another Armenian historian in India in the end of the 18th century was Hakob Simonian who wrote The History of Life and Activities of Brave Hyder Ali from the day of his Birth till his Death. From his book it is obvious that Simonian was quite familiar to Hyder Ali, many times spoke to him and even tried to use his links for the interests of the Armenians. He writes:
"In 1778, in the month of December I went to the Palace to see Nawab Bahadur with the intention to obtain from him a Firman about permitting the Armenians to trade freely in his country. There I was shown great favours from Hyder.     Nawab Bahadur promised to give the Armenians all what I requested. Besides the permission to trade, I also requested him to free my nation from any taxes".
         Armenian scholars who thoroughly examined The History conclude that the author basically used his own personal observations, diaries, stories of witnesses etc. He is the witness and sometimes the participant of events in the period of 1761-1784 (till the death of Hyder Ali). The History is all the more valuable for the author has not confined himself to a mere description of the private, intimate life of Harder but has outlined it as against the background of the political and military events in the history of Mysore during 1762-1782. The History speaks very little about the history of Indo-Armenian relations but even from that one can assume that the Armenians of Mysore enjoyed the patronage of Hyder and local population.
        Author says that the objective to write such a book was "to give the Armenians the spirit of sympathy, love and respect not only towards Hyder Ali but to all  Indian nation". The book is written in ancient Armenian. The author was fluent in Persian, English, French, Kannada besides Armenian.
        The fate of the original copy is uncertain. However, the book was wholly published in the journal Azdarar in Madras in 1794-1795 by Rev. Shumavon.
Mesrovb David Thaliadian has been a great Armenian scholar in India in the 19th century. He was an “erudite professor, a profound scholar, an eminent poet and an author of great merit”, as is written on a marble mural tablet in the Armenian Church in Calcutta.89
        In 1841 Thaliadian published the History of Ancient India in ancient Armenian language. In 1846 he published Annals of the Antiquities of Armenia.
 In 1845 he formed the Araratian Society, the aim of which was to publish works in Armenian language. In two years (1845-1847) he published almost ten works.  Almost twenty years (1823-1845) Thaliadian studied the manuscript of Khojamall's  History of India, compared with the English and local sources, edited it. In 1848 he published it periodically in the monthly journal Azgaser.
         The Araratian society had a journal Azgaser (Patriot) which was published from 1845 to 1848 and from 1848-1852 it was named Azgaser Araratian.
A born idealist, Thaliadian was, all the days of his stormy life, a confirmed nationalist and a patriotic scholar. He was the zealous standard bearer and  indefatigable champion of the  glorious culture and the unique literature of ancient Armenia.
        Speaking about the Armenian scholars  we have to mention also Mesrovb Jacob Seth whose life's mission was to record the history of the Armenians in India. For more than forty years he travelled all over India, from Lahore to Madras and from Surat to Dhaka to record the history about his compatriots in India as complete as possible. During his trips he experienced numerous hardships because of the nature of his work and the limited funds at his disposal. Under great physical difficulties and discomfort he succeeded in rescuing from oblivion thousands of old Armenian epitaphs from deserted cemeteries and churchyards.
         M. Seth displayed extraordinary aptitude for and interest in historical and antiquarian research, and for many decades engaged himself energetically in the study of old manuscripts, letters, epitaphs and memorial tablets in churches and cemeteries throughout India. The result of his work was a significant volume – Armenians in India, which was first published in 1937.
<<< previous page next page >>>